User agent detail

Links (2.8; Linux 3.10.17 x86_64; GNU C 4.8.1; text)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-295.php
Links 2.8unknown unknownLinux unknownunknownLinux DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Links 2.8 Linux Desktop0.011 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Links 2.8closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Links closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Links 2.8closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.22101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Links 2.8Text-based GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Links 2.8closeLinux 3.10.17closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Links 2.8 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose1.15107 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Links 2.8closeGNU closecloseclosecloseclose0.16301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Links 2.8 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Links 2.8 Linux closeclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Links 2.8closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:25 | by ThaDafinser