User agent detail

Microsoft Internet Explorer/5.2 (Windows 4.0; )
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-windows.yaml
Windows 95desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Microsoft closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeWindows 4.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Windows desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 1.0closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Internet Explorer 5.2 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Windows 95desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows Microsoftcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:23 | by ThaDafinser