User agent detail

OpenBSD ftp
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-849.php
yesOpenBSD ftpBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesOpenBSD ftpBot/Crawler0.011 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesOpenBSD ftpclose0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
OpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
OpenBSD desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeOpenBSD closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

OpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
OpenBSD closeclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeOpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:22 | by ThaDafinser