User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060730 MultiZilla/1.8.2.0i SeaMonkey/1.0.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
MultiZilla 1.8.2.0iclose closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.8.0.6close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

SeaMonkey 1.0.4closeOS/2 desktop-browsercloseclose0.23201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SeaMonkey 1.0Gecko OS/2 desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
SeaMonkey 1.0.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 1.0.4close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

SeaMonkey 1.0.4closeOS/2 closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Seamonkey 1.0.4Gecko 20060730OS/2 Warp closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SeaMonkey 1.0.4Gecko 1.8.0OS/2 Warp 4.5desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
MultiZilla 1.8.2.0iclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:20 | by ThaDafinser