User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.1; Lindows 3.01; DigExt)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Lindows 3.01desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MSIE 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 6.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE 6.1close desktop-browsercloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Internet Explorer 6.1Trident 0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 6.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.1close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Internet Explorer 6.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer 6.1Trident closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Lindows 3.01desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.1closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Internet Explorer 6.1close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:20 | by ThaDafinser