User agent detail

Safari/9537.73.11 CFNetwork/673.0.3 Darwin/13.0.2 (x86_64) (MacBookPro11%2C3)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-651.php
Safari 7.0WebKit unknownMacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Safari 7.0WebKit MacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Safari 7.0closeMacOSX closecloseDesktopclose0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 9537.73.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 9537.73.11close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari closeOS X 10.9desktop-browsercloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Safari WebKit Mac 10.9desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 673.0.3closeMac OS X 10.9.0AppleMacBookPro11,3closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeDarwin closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Safari Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Safari OS X Mavericks 10.9desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari closeMac OS Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:17 | by ThaDafinser