User agent detail

(Windows NT 10.0; Googlebot Googlebot-Image/1.0 msnbot-media/1.1 facebookexternalhit/1.1 Trident/7.0) Maxthon/4.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
closecloseyesBingclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Googlebot Googlebotcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closecloseclosecloseyesGoogleclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesBingclose0.21101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesBingBotSearch bot0.001 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesFacebookBotclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Maxthon 4.0closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesBingclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Maxthon 4.0closeWindows 10closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:14 | by ThaDafinser