User agent detail

PANTECH-C180/R01 Browser/Obigo/Q03c
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close PantechC180closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.022 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Teleca-Obigo closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
PANTECH-C180 R01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo Q 3cclose PantechC180mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Q03c PantechC180smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 3close PantechC180closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Q03c Browser Q03c closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 3 PantechC180mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Teleca Obigo Q03close PantechC180Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.035 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo Q03cclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:13 | by ThaDafinser