User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20080109 (Charlotte/0.9t; http://www.searchme.com/support/) (Charlotte/0.9t; http://www.searchme.com/support/)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Default Browser 0.0unknown unknownunknown unknownunknownunknownunknown0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.8.1.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:1.8.1.11closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.22001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesCharlotte0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesCharlotteclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.8.1.11closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Charlotte 0.9tcloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 1.8.1.11Gecko 20080109Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko 1.8.1Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:11 | by ThaDafinser