User agent detail

LG-LG620G[TF012114009741104000000018032359160] Obigo/WAP2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
Obigo WAP 2.0 620Gmobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.055 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Teleca-Obigo closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.09201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG-LG620G closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM LGLG-LG620Gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.21101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo WAP2 LG620Gsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 2.0close LG620Gcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 2.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15501 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo WAP2 Browser WAP2 LGLGLG620Gcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo WAP 2.0 LG620Gmobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close LGLG-LG620GFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo WAP2.0close LGLG620Gcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:08 | by ThaDafinser