User agent detail

MOT-v150/AS_G_09.09.0DR MIB/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close Motorolav150closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MOT-v150 AScloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Motorola Internet Browser 2.0close MotorolaV150mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Motorolav150smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Motorolav150closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

MIB 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera Mini MotorolaMotorola v150closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Motorola Internet Browser 2.0 Motorolav150mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close MotorolaV150Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
MIB 2.0close Motorolav150closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:00:04 | by ThaDafinser