User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/2.1.2; X11)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
Konqueror 2.1KHTML unknownunknown unknownunknowngeneral DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Konqueror 2.1KHTML Desktop0.028 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Konqueror 2.1close closecloseDesktopclose0.046 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Konqueror 2.1.2close desktop-browsercloseclose0.20201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Konqueror 2.1KHTML 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Konqueror 2.1.2;close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 2.1.2close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Konqueror 2.1.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Konqueror 2.1.2 a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Konqueror 2.1.2 desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Konqueror 2.1.2close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:58 | by ThaDafinser