User agent detail

BaiduHD/2.3.1 CFNetwork/671 Darwin/14.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/browser-baidu.yaml
Baidu Browser 2.3 iOS 7.0mobile:smartclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
CFNetwork WebKit Darwin AppleMacintoshDesktop0.024 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
CFNetwork closeDarwin closecloseDesktopclose0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
BaiduHD 2.3.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

Baidu Browser 2.3.1closeiOS 7.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Mac desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork closeiOS 7Applecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Baidu Browser 2.3 iOS 7.0mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Baidu Browser 2.3.1closeMac OS Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:52 | by ThaDafinser