User agent detail

LG NetFront/3.5 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGNetFrontclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
NetFront 3.5NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
NetFront 3.5close closecloseMobile Deviceyesclose0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront 3.5closeJVM AccessNetFront Ver. 3.5mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
NetFront 3.5NetFront LGNetFrontsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.5close LGNetFrontcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Netfront Browser 3.5 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.14901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

NetFront 3.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

NetFront closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NetFront 3.5 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
NetFront 3.5close AccessNetFront Ver. 3.5Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
NetFront 3.5close LGNetFrontcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:52 | by ThaDafinser