User agent detail

OneBrowser/3.0 (GT-S5233S/S5233SDDJE2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-317.php
OneBrowser 3.0WebKit unknownunknown unknownSamsungGT-S5233SMobile Phoneyesyes0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
OneBrowser 3.0WebKit SamsungGT-S5233SMobile Phoneyesyes0.011 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
OneBrowser 3.0close closecloseMobile Phoneyesyesclose0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
OneBrowser 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
ONE Browser 3.0WebKit SamsungGT-S5233Ssmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
ONE Browser 3.0close closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

OneBrowser 3.0 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
OneBrowser 3.0 Touchwiz SamsungStarmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
OneBrowser 3.0close SamsungS5233Scloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:52 | by ThaDafinser