User agent detail

Mozilla/3.0 (compatible; GoLive 6.0; Windows 2000)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/app-editor.yaml
Adobe GoLive 6.0 Windows 2000desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 3.0Gecko Desktop0.004 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Netscape 3.0close closecloseDesktopclose0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Adobe GoLive 6.0closeWindows 5.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.20601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Windows 2000desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 3.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 2000 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 3.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.14801 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 3.0 Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Adobe GoLive 6.0 Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows 2000closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:51 | by ThaDafinser