User agent detail

Links (0.99pre9; FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE i386; 80x25)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeFreeBSD 4.8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Links 0.9 FreeBSD Desktop0.013 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Links 0.9closeFreeBSD closecloseDesktopclose0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Links closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

Links 0.99pre9closeBSD 4.8-RELEASEdesktop-browsercloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Links 0.99Text-based FreeBSD 4.8desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Links 0.99closeFreeBSD 4.8closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Links 0.99 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.16001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Links 0.99pre9closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Links 0.99pre9 FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Links 0.99 FreeBSD 4.8closeclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Links 0.99pre9closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:44 | by ThaDafinser