User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WindowsCE 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2a2pre) Gecko/20090904 Fennec/1.0a3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Firefox closeWindows closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mobile Firefox 1.0a3closeWindows mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Fennec 1.0Gecko Windows desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.9close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox Mobile 1.0.0closeWindows CE closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.9.2closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15501 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Fennec 1.0a3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Fennec 1.0a3Gecko 20090904Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Firefox Mobile Fennec 1.0a3Gecko 1.9.2a2Windows CE mobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Fennec 1.0a3closeWindows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:41 | by ThaDafinser