User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021207 Phoenix/0.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
Phoenix 0.5closeGNU/Linux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.3acloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Phoenix (old name for Firefox) 0.5closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Phoenix 0.5Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Phoenix 0.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Phoenix 0.5closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Phoenix 0.5Gecko 1.3closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Phoenix 0.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.09 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Phoenix 0.5Gecko 20021207Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Phoenix 0.5Gecko 1.3Linux desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Phoenix 0.5closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:36 | by ThaDafinser