User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030610 Mozilla Firebird/0.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Firefox 0.6Gecko 1.0WinNT 4.0unknownWindows DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Firefox 0.6Gecko 1.0WinNT 4.0Desktop0.019 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.4bcloseWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Firebird (old name for Firefox) 0.6closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.21801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Firebird 0.6Gecko Windows NTdesktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Firebird 0.6close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows NT 4.0 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Firebird 0.6Gecko 1.4closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Firebird 0.6closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Firebird 0.6Gecko 20030610Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Firebird 0.6Gecko 1.4Windows NT 4.0desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Firebird 0.6closeWindows NT 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:36 | by ThaDafinser