User agent detail

ELinks (0.10.6; Linux 2.6.16-hardened-r10 i686; 80x25)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeLinux 2.6.16closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
ELinks 0.10 Linux Desktop0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
ELinks 0.10closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
ELinks closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Elinks 0.10.6closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.24501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Elinks Text-based GNU/Linux desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
ELinks 0.10closeLinux 2.6.16closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Links 0.10.6 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15501 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

ELinks 0.10.6closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

ELinks 0.10.6 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
ELinks 0.10.6 Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Elinks closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:35 | by ThaDafinser