User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.4; CYGWIN_NT-5.1) KHTML/3.4.89 (like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Konqueror 3.4KHTML Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Konqueror 3.4KHTML Desktop0.077 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Konqueror 3.4close closecloseDesktopclose0.071 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Konqueror 3.4close desktop-browsercloseclose0.19901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Konqueror 3.4KHTML Windows XPdesktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Konqueror 3.4;close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 3.4close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Konqueror 3.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Konqueror 3.4 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Konqueror 3.4KHTML 3.4.89 desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Konqueror 3.4close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:33 | by ThaDafinser