User agent detail

Opera/7.50 (Windows XP; U)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-865.php
Opera 7.50Presto 1.0WinXP 5.1unknownWindows DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 7.50Presto 1.0WinXP 5.1Desktop0.014 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 7.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 7.50closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.20201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 7.50Presto Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 7.50close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 7.50closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 7.50 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.16201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 7.50closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 7.50 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 7.50 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 7.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 7.50closeWindows XP Desktopcloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 7.50closeWindows XPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:33 | by ThaDafinser