User agent detail

IRLbot/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; http://irl.cs.tamu.edu/crawler)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
yesIRLbotBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesIRLbotBot/Crawler0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesIRLbotclose0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesIRLbot/2.0 bclose0.20401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesIRLbotclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesIRLbotCrawler0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer 6.0Trident closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Internet Explorer 6.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:32 | by ThaDafinser