User agent detail

Y!J-BRJ/YATS crawler (http://listing.yahoo.co.jp/support/faq/int/other/other_001.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Woothee
v1.3.0
vendor/woothee/woothee-testset/testsets/crawler.yaml
close closecloseclosecloseyesYahoo! Japanclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesY!J-AGENTBot/Crawler0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesY!J-AGENTclose0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Y closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closecloseclosecloseyesYahooclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesY!J-BRJ/YATSclose0.20601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesYATS crawlerclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseclosecloseyesYahooclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesYahoo! Japanclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesYahoo! Japanclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:30 | by ThaDafinser