User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (OpenBSD i386) AppleWebKit/538.1+ (KHTML, like Gecko) WebKitGTK+/2.2.3 luakit/0d5f4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
LuaKit Webkit 538.1OpenBSD closecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 538.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
LuaKit WebKit OpenBSD desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
LuaKit closeOpenBSD closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 538.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.09401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 538.1OpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
LuaKit Webkit 538.1OpenBSD closeclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeOpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:29 | by ThaDafinser