User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DTV) AppleWebKit/531.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Espial/6.1.15 AQUOSBrowser/1.0 (AS00DTV;V;0001;0001)AQUOS-AS/2.0 LC-60UQ10E
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/sharp.yaml
Espial 6.1.15Webkit 531.2 UQ10Etelevisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 531.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Espial 6.1.15close media-playercloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Espial TV Browser 6.1WebKit SharpLC-60UQ10Etv0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Espial 6.1.15close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 531.2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Espial 6.1.15Webkit 531.2 SharpUQ10E Aquos TVtelevisioncloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SharpAQUOS TV BrowserSmart-TVcloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Espial 6.1.15close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:24 | by ThaDafinser