User agent detail

Inne: Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; Ask Jeeves/Teoma; http://sp.ask.com/docs/about/tech_crawling.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Ask Jeeves close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Inne closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesAsk Jeevesclose0.22101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesAsk JeevesSearch bot0.001 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesAsk Jeevesclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesTeomaCrawler0.068 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 2.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.30802 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesAsk Jeevesclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:21 | by ThaDafinser