User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SMART-TV; Linux) AppleWebkit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/538.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/samsung.yaml
Webkit 538.1 televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebkit 538.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 538.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari 538.1closeLinux media-playercloseclose0.20301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux SamsungSmart TVtv0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Safari 538.1WebKit 538.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15601 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.072 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

WebKit 538.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 538.1 SamsungSmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari closeGNU/Linux Samsung Smart TVcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:20 | by ThaDafinser