User agent detail

Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; Go.Web/6.5; HandHTTP 1.1; Elaine/1.0; RIM957 )
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close GenericSmartphoneclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 2.0Gecko Desktop0.004 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Netscape 2.0close closecloseDesktopclose0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closePalmOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Go.Web 6.5closeBlackBerry OS RIM957mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
RIMBlackBerry 957smartphoneyes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 2.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.16801 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 2.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Go.Web 6.5 BlackBerry OS RIM957mobile:smartyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:17 | by ThaDafinser