User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Iriver ; EB07 ) AppleWebKit/534.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/534.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/ereader/other.yaml
Webkit 534.16 Story HD EB07ereaderclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari 5.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.20201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Safari 5.0WebKit 0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 5.0close closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Safari 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Safari 5.0WebKit 534.16 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 534.16 iRiverStory HD EB07ereaderyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari 5.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:12 | by ThaDafinser