User agent detail

Flint/173 CFNetwork/673.0.3 Darwin/13.0.0 (x86_64) (MacBookPro10%2C1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-651.php
CFNetwork 0.0WebKit unknownMacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
CFNetwork WebKit MacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop0.014 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
CFNetwork closeMacOSX closecloseDesktopclose0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Flint 173closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

closeOS X 10.9desktop-browsercloseclose0.22001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Mac 10.9desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 673.0.3closeMac OS X 10.9.0AppleMacBookPro10,1closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
OS X Mavericks 10.9desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeMac OS Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:06 | by ThaDafinser