User agent detail

MOT-c350/G_09.04.35R MIB/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close Motorolac350closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Motorola Internet Browser 2.0 MotorolaC350Mobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MOT-c350 Gcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Motorola Internet Browser 2.0close MotorolaC350mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Motorolac350smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Motorolac350closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

MIB 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.085 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Motorola Internet Browser 2.0 Motorolac350mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close MotorolaC350Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
MIB 2.0close Motorolac350closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:05 | by ThaDafinser