User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_7 HTC_DesireHD-orange-LS; en-us) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/530.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close HTCDesireHD-orange-LSclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Safari 4.0WebKit MacOSX 10.5AppleMacintoshDesktop0.04 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
Safari closeMacOSX closecloseDesktopcloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
BrowscapPhp
6014
Safari 4.0closeMacOSX closecloseDesktopclose0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 4.0closeOS X 10_5_7closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari 4.0closeOS X HTCDesireHDdesktop-browsercloseclose0.21401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Safari 4.0WebKit Mac 10.5HTCDesireHD-orange-LSsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari 4.0closeOS X 10.5.7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.0closeMac OS X 10.5.7HTCDesireHD-orange-LScloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Safari 530.17WebKit 530.17closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari 4.0closeOS X 10.5.7closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Safari 4.0WebKit 530.17Mac OS X 10.5.7HTC Desire HDcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.32502 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Safari 4.0Webkit 530.17Mac OS X 10.5HTCDesireHDmobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Safari 4.0closeMac OS X 10.5.7HTCFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari 4.0closeMac OS X 10.5.7 HTC.DesireHD-orange-LS HTC Desirecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:05 | by ThaDafinser