User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; Pt-br; lg-te365 teleca) UCBrowser8.4.0.159/69/352/UCWEB Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGte365closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBot/Crawler0.031 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.053 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close LGte365mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 8.4 LGte365smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.4.0close LGte365closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Teleca-Obigo te365close closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 8.4.0.159 LGLGte365closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo LGte365mobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close UCWebUCBrowserFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Teleca close LGte365closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:59:00 | by ThaDafinser