User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; xx; rv:1.9.1b4) Gecko/20130508 Fedora/1.9.1-2.5.rs3.0 NaenaraBrowser/3.5b4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-redstar.yaml
Naenara 3.5Gecko 1.9.1b4Red Star 3.0desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.9.1b4closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:1.9.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Fedora 1.9desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeFedora 1.9.1closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.9.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

ABrowse closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Naenara 3.5b4Gecko 20130508Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Naenara 3.5Gecko 1.9.1b4Red Star 3.0desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeFedora closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:58:59 | by ThaDafinser