User agent detail

SonyEricssonT280a/R1CB002 TelecaBrowser/Q04C1-1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SonyEricssonT280aclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SonyEricssonT280a R1CB002closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo Q 4close Sony EricssonT280amobile-browseryescloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Sony EricssonT280afeature phoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close SonyEricssonT280acloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Teleca-Obigo close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Sony EricssonSony Ericsson T280acloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 4C Sony EricssonT280amobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close SonyEricssonT280aFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Teleca Browserclose SonyEricssonT280acloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:58:56 | by ThaDafinser