User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; xx) AppleWebKit/525.1+ (KHTML, like Gecko, Safari/525.1+) midori
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-midori.yaml
Midori Webkit 525.1Linux desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 525.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 525.1+closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari 525.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Midori WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 525.1closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Safari 525.1WebKit 525.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Midori closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Midori WebKit 525.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Midori Webkit 525.1Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Midori closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:58:52 | by ThaDafinser