User agent detail

DoCoMo/2.0 F883i(c100;TB;W20H08)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close DoCoMoF883iclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
DoCoMo 2.0 JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.017 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
DoCoMo 2.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Deviceyesclose0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
DoCoMo 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront close DoCoMomobile-browseryescloseclose0.19601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
DoCoMoF883ifeature phoneyes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoF883icloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

F883icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
FujitsuF883imobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo F883icloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close DoCoMoFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
DoCoMo 2.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:58:49 | by ThaDafinser