User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Sun Solaris; xx) AppleWebKit/533.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) QupZilla/1.4.4 Safari/533.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-solaris.yaml
QupZilla 1.4.4Webkit 533.3Solaris desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 533.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 533.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

QupZilla 1.4.4closeSolaris desktop-browsercloseclose0.20301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Safari WebKit Solaris desktop0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QupZilla 1.4.4close closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Safari 533.3WebKit 533.3closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.14901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

QupZilla 1.4.4WebKit 533.3a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
QupZilla 1.4.4Webkit 533.3Solaris desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
QupZilla 1.4.4closeSolaris closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:58:48 | by ThaDafinser