User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows 98; DigExt; Crayon Crawler)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Crayon Crawler close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
IE 5.0Trident Win98 98Desktop0.02 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
IE 5.0closeWin32 closecloseDesktopclose0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MSIE 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 5.0closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE 5.0closeWindows 98desktop-browsercloseclose0.21401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 5.0closeWindows 98closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesCrayon Crawlerclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Internet Explorer 5.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Internet Explorer 5.0closeWindows 98 closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer 5.0Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Internet Explorer 5.0closeWindows 98closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:58:48 | by ThaDafinser