User agent detail

SAMSUNGSGH-i450/UCWEB8.7.0.187/28/10086
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 8.7Gecko Series60 i450mobile:smartclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNGSGH-i450 UCWEB8.7.0.187closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
UCBrowser close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close SamsungSGH-i450mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 8.7 SamsungSGH-i450smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.7.0close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser 8.7.0.187close closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 8.7.0.187 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 8.7Gecko Series60 Samsungi450mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 8.7.0.187close Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:58:48 | by ThaDafinser