User agent detail

NCSA_Mosaic/2.7b5 (X11;Linux 2.6.7 i686) libwww/2.12 modified
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
NCSA Mosaic 2.7 GNU/Linux desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yeslibwwwBot/Crawler0.024 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyeslibwwwclose0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
NCSA closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

NCSA Mosaic 2.7b5closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
NCSA Mosaic 2.7 GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NCSA Mosaic 2.7closeLinux 2.6.7closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

NCSA_Mosaic 2.7b5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.083 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mosaic 2.7b5 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NCSA Mosaic 2.7 Linux desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Mosaic 2.7b5closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:58:47 | by ThaDafinser