User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (AAC; Linux; U; ja-JP) (KHTML, like Gecko) InettvBrowser/2.2 (000087;IP07-04;0100;0000)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close Generic_InettvIP07-04closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close media-playercloseclose0.20001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux desktop0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux IP07-04closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0KHTML 2.2closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.075 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet TV Browser 2.2 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25902 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
HitachiSmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
InternetTVBrowser closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:58:47 | by ThaDafinser