User agent detail

BIRD F518/1.00 Nucleus RTOS/V1.11.19 MTK6227/06A Release/12.28.2006 Browser/Teleca Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close BirdF518closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
BIRD closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
UCBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.004 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM BirdF518mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo MTK / Nucleus BirdF518feature phoneyes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close BirdF518closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Teleca-Obigo close closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo BirdF518mobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close BirdF518Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Teleca Profileclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:58:43 | by ThaDafinser