User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows XP; U) Opera 6.05 [de]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Default Browser 0.0unknown unknownunknown unknownunknownunknownunknown0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 6.05closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera 6.05closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 6.05closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 6.05Presto Windows XPdesktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 6.05close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 6.5closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 6.05 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 6.05closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 6.5 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 6.05 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 6.05closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.068 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 6.05closeWindows XPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:58:38 | by ThaDafinser