User agent detail

MOZILLA50 (SYMBIANOS92 U SERIES60/31 SAMSUNG/SGH-I458B/
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungSGH-I458Bclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeSymbianOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeSeries60 31Samsungi458mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Nokia OSS Browser 31 Symbian OS Series 60 31SamsungSGH-I458Bsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungSGH-I458Bcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 50 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Browser for S60 closeSYMBIANOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.07 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator Symbian Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.26401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Series60 31Samsungi458mobile:smartyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 31Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeSymbianOS Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:58:36 | by ThaDafinser