User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20051119 MultiZilla/1.8.1.0s SeaMonkey/1.5a
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
MultiZilla 1.8.1.0sclose closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.9a1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

SeaMonkey 1.5acloseOS/2 desktop-browsercloseclose0.20301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SeaMonkey 1.5Gecko OS/2 desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
SeaMonkey 1.5aclose closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 1.5close closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

SeaMonkey 1.5acloseOS/2 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Seamonkey 1.5aGecko 20051119OS/2 Warp closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SeaMonkey 1.5Gecko 1.9a1OS/2 Warp 4.5desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
MultiZilla 1.8.1.0sclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:58:26 | by ThaDafinser