User agent detail

InettvBrowser/1.0 (00A0B0;VIP1200J;001;000) TvpsExtInfo/A07F91 (6A07000000000001;10) (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Win32)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/other.yaml
televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close media-playercloseclose0.20101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows 95desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeWindows 95 VIP1200Jcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows 32 closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet TV Browser 1.0 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
I-O Data DeviceSmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:58:23 | by ThaDafinser