User agent detail

SAMSUNG-S8000/1.0 SHP/VPP/R5 Jasmine/1.0 Nextreaming SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungS8000closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Jasmine 1.0NetFront JAVA SamsungGT-S8000Mobile Phoneyes0.006 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNG-S8000 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Jasmine 1.0close SamsungGT-S8000mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Jasmine 1.0 SamsungS8000smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Jasmine 1.0close SamsungS8000closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Jasmine 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Dolfin 1.0 Touchwiz 2.0 or earlierSamsungJetmobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close SamsungGT-S8000Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Jasmine 1.0close SamsungS8000closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:58:16 | by ThaDafinser